ME - Mail-order pharmacy apportionment The Maine Supreme Judicial Court held that a nationwide mail-order prescription drug insurance business was required to apportion its receipts to the locations of the retail pharmacies from which pres...
MA - Withholding regulations finalized Massachusetts finalized amendments to personal income tax regulations that clarify withholding for:income from sports wagering; andlottery winnings of more than $600.830 CMR 62B.2.1, Massachusetts Dep...
NH - Interest rates increase Interest rates on underpayments and refunds will increase for 2024.For 2024, rates are:9% for underpayments; and6% for refunds.Technical Information Release TIR 2023-002, New Hampshire Department of R...
VT - Guidance for assessing officials on property ownership issued Vermont has issued a publication providing answers to common questions regarding ownership. The publication discusses date of ownership, grand list ownership codes, common types of deeds, common deed-...
For 2024, the Social Securitywagecap will be $168,600, and social security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits will increase by 3.2percent. These changes reflect cost-of-living adjustments to account for inflation.
For2024, theSocial Securitywagecapwill be $168,600, andsocial securityand Supplemental Security Income (SSI)benefitswillincreaseby3.2percent. Thesechangesreflect cost-of-living adjustments to account for inflation.
WageCapforSocial SecurityTax
The Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) tax onwagesis 7.65percenteach for the employee and the employer. FICA tax has two components:
a 6.2percentsocial securitytax, also known as old age, survivors, and disability insurance (OASDI); and
a 1.45percentMedicare tax, also known as hospital insurance (HI).
For self-employed workers, the Self-Employment tax is 15.3percent, consisting of:
a 12.4percentOASDI tax; and
a 2.9percentHI tax.
OASDI tax applies only up to awagebase, which includes mostwagesand self-employment income up to the annualwagecap.
For2024, thewagebase is $168,600. Thus, OASDI tax applies only to the taxpayer’s first $168,600 inwagesor net earnings from self-employment. Taxpayers do not pay any OASDI tax on earnings that exceed $168,600.
There is nowagecapfor HI tax.
MaximumSocial SecurityTax for2024
For workers who earn $168,600 or more in2024:
an employee will pay a total of $10,453.2 insocial securitytax ($168,600 x 6.2percent);
the employer will pay the sameamount; and
a self-employed worker will pay a total of $20,906.4 insocial securitytax ($168,600 x 12.4percent).
Additional Medicare Tax
Higher-income workers may have to pay an Additional Medicare tax of 0.9percent. This tax applies towagesand self-employment income that exceed:
$250,000 for married taxpayers who file a joint return;
$125,000 for married taxpayers who file separate returns; and
$200,000 for other taxpayers.
The annualwagecapdoes not affect the Additional Medicare tax.
BenefitIncreasefor2024
Finally, a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) willincreasesocial securityand SSIbenefitsfor2024by3.2percent. The COLA is intended to ensure that inflation does not erode the purchasing power of thesebenefits.
The IRS announced taxrelief for individuals and businesses affected by terroristattacks in the State of Israel. The IRS would continue to monitor events and may provide additional relief.
The IRS announcedtaxrelieffor individuals and businesses affected byterroristattacksin the State ofIsrael. The IRS would continue to monitor events and may provide additionalrelief.
Filing and Payment Deadlines Extended
The IRS extended certain deadlines that occurred or would occur during the period from October 7, 2023, through October 7, 2024. As a result, affected individuals and businesses would have until October 7, 2024, to file returns and pay anytaxesthat were originally due during this period. This extension includes filing for most returns, including:
individuals who had a valid extension to file their 2022 return due to run out on October 16, 2023. However, becausetaxpayments related to these 2022 returns were due on April 18, 2023, those payments were not eligible for thisrelief. So, these individuals filing on extension have more time to file, but not to pay;
calendar-year corporations whose 2022 extensions run out on October 16, 2023. Similarly, these corporations have more time to file, but not to pay;
2023 individual and business returns and payments normally due on March 15 and April 15, 2024. These individuals and businesses have both more time to file and more time to pay;
quarterly estimated incometaxpayments normally due on January 16, April 15, June 17 and September 16, 2024;
quarterly payroll and excisetaxreturns normally due on October 31, 2023, and January 31, April 30 and July 31, 2024;
calendar-yeartax-exempt organizations whose extensions run out on November 15, 2023; and
retirement plan contributions and rollovers.
The penalty for failure to make payroll and excisetaxdeposits due on or after October 7, 2023 and before November 6, 2023, would beabated. But the deposits must be made by November 6, 2023.
The Internal Revenue Service could release as soon as today the process that businesses can use to withdraw employee retention creditclaims.
TheInternal Revenue Servicecouldreleaseas soon as today theprocessthat businesses can use to withdrawemployee retention creditclaims.
The move comes in the wake of the agency announcing that it is halting the processing of newERCclaimsuntil at least the beginning of 2024 and scrutinizing existingclaimsdue to the prevalence of suspected fraudulentclaimsfollowing a spike inclaimsin 2023 coupled with the saturation marketing by so-calledERCmills. Thus far, theIRScloser examination ofclaimshas led to thousands already being submitted for auditing.
As part of the heightened scrutiny ofclaims, theIRSsaid it would create aprocessby which businesses would have the ability to withdrawclaimsbefore they are processed if they do a more thorough review and determine theclaimis not actually a validclaimfor the credit that was created as part of the CARES Act to help businesses that may have lost income retain employees during the COVID-19 pandemic.
"I learned this morning that there is going to be an announcement tomorrow [October 19, 2023] on the withdrawalprocessinitiative that the Service is going to be initiating,"Linda Azmon, special counsel at theIRS’s Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division, said October 18, 2023, during a session of the American Bar Association’s Virtual 2023 Fall Tax Meeting.
Azmon said that"taxpayers who have not received theirclaimsfor refund will be entitled to participate in thisprocess,"adding that there is"going to be specific procedures that taxpayers can follow to request their withdrawal of theirclaimsfor refund."
She did not provide any specific information on what theprocessentails, but noted that requesting a withdrawal"means that a taxpayer is requesting that the amended return not be processed at all. And it’s going to be required that the complete return be withdrawn."This is limited to taxpayers who have not had theirclaimprocessed, have not received their check or who have the check but have not yet cashed it.
One of the reasons a taxpayer may want to withdraw aclaimis"taxpayers have been advised that the only way the Service can recaptureclaimsfor refund is through the erroneous refund procedures,"she said."That usually means the service asks for the funds back and if they don’t receive it, the Service asks [the] Department of Justice to bringsuitwithin two years of the payment."
But Azmon points out that taxpayers being told this are being given information that is not entirely correct, as the agency has issued final regulations that allow theIRSto treat an erroneous refund as an underpayment of tax subject to the regular assessment and administrative collections procedures.
"This is a way for the service to recover funds that a taxpayer should have received in an efficient way without the cost of litigation,"she said."And it still provides the administrative processing rights for taxpayers to dispute theirclaims"without the cost of litigation.
The Internal Revenue Servicedetailed how it is proceeding with a pilot program that will allow taxpayers to file their taxes directly on the IRS website as an option along with doing an electronic file or working through a tax professional or other third-party tax preparer.
TheInternal Revenue Servicedetailedhow it is proceeding with apilotprogram that will allow taxpayers tofiletheir taxes directly on theIRSwebsite as an option along with doing an electronicfileor working through a tax professional or other third-party tax preparer.
Residents in select states will have the option to participate thedirectfileprogram, which is being set up as part of the provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act, in the upcoming 2024 tax filing season. The nine states included in thepilotare states that do not have a state income tax, including Alaska, Florida, New Hampshire, Nevada, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming. Thepilotwill also include four states that have a state income tax – Arizona, California, Massachusetts, and New York – and in those states, thedirectfilepilotwill incorporate filing state income taxes.
The agency is expecting several hundred thousand taxpayers across the thirteen states to participate in thepilot.
"We will be working closely with the states in this important test run that will help us gather information about the future direction of thedirectfileprogram,"IRSCommissioner Daniel Werfel said during an October 17, 2023, press teleconference."Thepilotwill allow us to further assess customer and technology needs that will help us evaluate and develop successful solutions for any challenges posed by thedirectfileoption."
Werfel stressed that there is no intention for theIRSto require taxpayers use thedirectfileoption and if thepilotproves successful and the agency moves forward with the program, it will simply be another option in addition to everything that currently is available for taxpayers tofiletax returns without eliminating any of those other options.
He noted that thepilotwill be aimed at individual tax returns and will be limited in scope. Not every taxpayer in thosepilotstates will be able to participate.
"Thepilotwill not cover all types of income, deductions, or credits,"Werfel said."At this point, we anticipate that specific income types, such as wages from Form W-2 and important tax credits, like the earned income tax credit and the child tax credit, will be covered by thepilot."
According to anIRSstatement issued the same day, the agency also expects participation will include Social Security and railroad retirement income, unemployment compensation, interest income of $1,500 or less, credits for other dependents, and a few deductions, including the standard deduction, student loan interest, and educator expenses.
Some examples that were given that would disqualify a taxpayer from filing through thedirectfilepilotwould be those receiving the health care premium tax credit or those filing a Schedule C with their tax return, though in future years if the agency moved forward beyond thepilot, those could be incorporated into the freefileprogram.
He added that the agency is still working on thepilot’s details and that testing is still ongoing. Participants who will be invited to use the freefileprogram in thepilotphase will be noticed later this year. Those participating in thepilotprogram will have their own dedicated customer service representatives to help them with the filing process.
Werfel provided a broad look at the metrics that will be used to evaluate the program, including the customer experience, logistics and how well theIRScan operate such adirectfileplatform, and how many taxpayers thepilotactually draws in addition to how many ultimately meet the criteria for participation, which will help quantify the demand for the program overall.
The IRS released substantial new guidance regarding the new clean vehicle credit and the used clean vehicle credit. The guidance updates procedures for manufacturer, dealer and seller registrations and written reports; and provides detailed rules for a taxpayer’s election to transfer a credit to the dealer after 2023. The guidance includes:
The IRS released substantial new guidance regarding the new clean vehicle credit and the used clean vehicle credit. The guidance updates procedures for manufacturer, dealer and seller registrations and written reports; and provides detailed rules for a taxpayer’s election to transfer a credit to the dealer after 2023. The guidance includes:
-- Rev. Proc. 2023-33, which is scheduled to be published on October 23, 2023, in I.R.B. 2023-43;
--NPRMREG-113064-23, which is scheduled to published in the Federal Register on October 10, 2023; and
-- IRS Fact Sheet FS-2023-22, which updates the IRS Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for the clean vehicle credits.
The proposed regs are generally proposed to apply to tax years beginning after they are published in the Federal Register. However, the proposed regs for transferring credits to dealers are proposed to apply beginning on January 1, 2024, which is when the transfer election becomes available. Proposed regs for treating the omission of a correct vehicle identification number (VIN) as a mathematical or clerical error would also apply to theCode Sec. 45Wclean commercial vehicle credit. They are proposed to apply to tax years beginning after December 31, 2023.
For purposes of the new clean vehicle credit, the used clean vehicle credit, and the commercial clean vehicle credit, the proposed regs would treat a taxpayer as having omitted the required correct vehicle identification number (VIN) for the vehicle if the VIN is missing from the taxpayer’s return or the number reported on the return is an invalid VIN. An invalid VIN is a number that does not match any existing VIN reported by a qualified manufacturer. A taxpayer would also be treated as omitting the VIN if the provided VIN is not for a qualified vehicle for the year the credit is claimed.
With respect to the new clean vehicle credit and the used clean vehicle credit, the proposed regs would clarify that taxpayer must file an income tax return for the year the clean vehicle is placed in service, including a Form 8936, Clean Vehicle Credits. The taxpayer is treated as having omitted the vehicle’s correct VIN if the VIN on the taxpayer’s return does not match the VIN in the seller’s report. In addition, a dealer under the proposed regs would not include persons licensed solely by a U.S. territory. To facilitate direct-to-consumer sales, a dealer generally could make sales outside the jurisdiction where it is licensed; however, it could not make sales at sites outside its own jurisdiction.
New Rules for Used Clean Vehicle Credit
The proposed regs would clarify that a vehicle’s eligibility for the used vehicle credit is not affected by a title that indicates it has been damaged or an otherwise a branded title. In addition, the used vehicle credit could not be divided among multiple owners of a single vehicle. With respect to the MAGI limit for eligible taxpayers, if the taxpayer's filing status for the tax year differs from the taxpayer's filing status in the preceding tax year, the taxpayer would satisfy the limit if MAGI does not exceed the threshold amount in either year based on the applicable filing status for that tax year. These last two rules are consistent with earlier proposed regs for the new clean vehicle credit.
The proposed regs would provide a first transfer rule, under which a qualified sale must be the first transfer of the previously-owned clean vehicle since August 16, 2022, as shown by the vehicle history of such vehicle, after the sale to the original owner. The rule would ignore transfers between dealers. The taxpayer generally could rely on the dealer’s representation of the vehicle history; however, taxpayers would also be encouraged to independently examine the vehicle history to confirm whether the first transfer rule is satisfied.
Under the proposed regs, a used vehicle’s sale price would include delivery charges, as well as fees and charges imposed by the dealer. The sale price it would not include separately-stated taxes and fees required by law, separate financing, extended warranties, insurance or maintenance service charges.
Cancellation of Sale, Return of Clean Vehicle, and Resale of Clean Vehicle
The proposed regs would clarify that a taxpayer cannot claim a clean vehicle credit if the sale is canceled before the taxpayer places th vehicle in service (that is, before the taxpayer takes delivery). The credits also would not be available if the taxpayer returns the vehicle within 30 days after placing it in service. A returned new clean vehicle would no longer qualify as a new clean vehicle. However, a returned used clean vehicle could continue to qualify for the credit if the vehicle history does not reflect the sale and return. A vehicle’s return would nullify any election the taxpayer made to transfer the credit for the vehicle.
Under the proposed regs, a taxpayer acquires a clean vehicle for resale if the resale occurs withing 30 days after the taxpayer places the vehicle in service. The resold vehicle would not qualify for either credit. If the taxpayer elected to transfer the credit, the election remains valid after the resale; thus, the credit is recaptured from the taxpayer, not from the dealer.
Taxpayers returning or reselling a clean vehicle more than 30 days after the date the taxpayer placed it in service would generally remain eligible for the applicable clean vehicle credit for purchasing the vehicle. Any election to transfer the taxpayer’s credit to the dealer also remains in effect. The returned or resold vehicle would not remain eligible for either credit. However, the IRS could disallow the credit if, based on the facts and circumstances, it determines that the taxpayer purchased the vehicle with the intent to resell or return it
Taxpayer's Election to Transfer Clean Vehicle Credit to Dealer
A taxpayer that elects to transfer a credit to a registered dealer must transfer the entire amount of the allowable credit. Each taxpayer may transfer a total of two credits per year (either two new clean vehicle credits, or one new clean vehicle credit and one used clean vehicle credit). This is the case even if married taxpayers file a joint return. A transfer election is irrevocable.
Under the proposed regs, the amount of a clean vehicle credit an electing taxpayer could transfer could exceed the electing taxpayer’s regular tax liability; and the amount of a transferred credit would not be subject to recapture merely because it exceeds the taxpayer’s tax liability. The dealer’s payment for the transferred credit, whether in cash or as a partial payment or down payment for the vehicle, is not includible in the electing taxpayer’s gross income. To ensure that the credit properly reduces the taxpayer’s basis in the vehicle, the electing taxpayer is treated as repaying the payment to the dealer as part of the purchase price of the vehicle.
Both the electing taxpayer and the dealer must make detailed disclosures and attestations. Some of these disclosures must be made to the other party, and some must be made through the IRS Energy Credits Online Portal. All must be made no later than the time of the sale. A taxpayer cannot transfer any portion of the new clean vehicle credit that is treated as part of the general business credit.
A seller or a registered dealer must retain records of transferred credits for at least three years after the taxpayer makes the credit transfer election or a seller files its report for the sale.
Manufacturer, Dealer and Seller Registration and Report Requirements
Clean vehicle manufacturers, sellers and dealers must register through an IRS Energy Credits Online Portal that should be available on the IRS website later this month. A representative of the manufacturer, seller or dealer will have to create or sign into an account on irs.gov. Registration help is available atwww.irs.gov/registerhelp. Manufacturers, sellers and dealers may checkIRS.gov/cleanvehiclesfor updates.
Taxpayers and sellers may rely on information and certifications by a qualified manufacturer providing that a vehicle is eligible for the new clean vehicle credit or the used clean vehicle credit. However, this reliance is limited to information regarding the vehicle’s eligibility for the applicable credit.
Rev. Proc. 2023-33 details the required registration information for sellers and dealers. The IRS will confirm the information or notify the seller or dealer that it has been unable to do so. If the IRS accepts a dealer registration, it will issue a unique dealer identification number. If the IRS rejects the registration, the dealer may request administrative review.
s for a qualified manufacturer’s written agreement with and a dealer’s written reports to the IRS before January 1, 2024, manufacturers and sellers may still use the procedures described inRev. Proc. 2022-42. However, as of January 1, 2024, qualified manufacturers must have entered into written agreements with the IRS via the IRS Energy Credits Online Portal, even if they previously registered and filed written agreements under Rev. Proc. 2022-42. Also as of January 1, 2024, qualified manufacturers and sellers must use the Portal to file their required reports to the IRS.
A seller must file its report within three calendar days of the sale, and provide a copy to the taxpayer within another three days. If the information in the report does not match information in IRS records, the IRS may reject the report and notify the seller. The seller must notify the buyer within three calendar days. If the IRS rejects a seller report, a dealer will not be eligible for advance credit payments. A seller must also use the Portal to update or rescind information for a scrivener’s error or the cancellation of a sale as promptly as possible (the seller must also file a new report noting the return of a vehicle). The seller must notify the buyer within three calendar days and provide a copy of the updated or rescinded report.
Advance Credit Payments to Dealers
When a buyer elects to transfer a clean vehicle credit to a dealer, the advance credit program allows the dealer to receive payment of the credit before the dealer files its tax return. The proposed regs would clarify that the advance payments are not included in the dealer’s income and they may exceed the dealer’s tax liability. The dealer cannot deduct the payment made to the electing taxpayer. The advance payment is included in the amount realized by the dealer on the sale of the clean vehicle. If the dealer is a partnership or an S corporation, the advance payment is not treated as exempt income.
To receive advance credit payments, the registered dealer must be an eligible entity under the proposed regs. An eligible entity is a registered dealer that submits additional registration information and is in dealer tax compliance. The IRS will conduct dealer tax compliance checks before disbursing an advance credit payment, and also on a continuing and regular basis.
Dealer tax compliance means that, for all tax periods during the most recent five tax years, the dealer has filed all of its required federal information and tax returns, including for federal income and employment tax; and paid all federal tax, penalties, and interest due at the time of sale (or is current on its obligations under any installment agreement with the IRS). The dealer must also retain information related to the vehicle sale or credit transfer for at least three years. A dealer that does not satisfy this test may still be a registered dealer, but it cannot be an eligible entity until the tax compliance issue is resolved.
The dealer that receives the transferred credit must provide the qualified vehicle’s VIN, the seller report, and the required taxpayer disclosure information through the IRS Energy Credits Online Portal. The IRS will disburse advance payments of the credits only through electronic payments; it will not issue any paper checks.
The IRS may suspend a registered dealer’s eligibility to participate in the advance payment program for sever reasons, including the provision of inaccurate information regarding eligible for the credit; failure to satisfy dealer tax compliance requirements; and failure to properly use the IRS Energy Credits Online Portal. The IRS will notify the dealer of its suspension, and give the dealer an opportunity correct the errors. If a suspended dealer does not correct the errors withing one year, the IRS will revoke its registration.
The IRS may also revoke a dealer’s registration to receive transferred credits and its eligibility for the advance payment program for failure to comply with the registration or tax compliance requirements, for losing its dealer license, for providing inaccurate information, for failing to retain required records for three years, or if it is suspended three times in the preceding year. The IRS will notify the dealer within 30 days of its decision to revoke eligibility for the advance payment program, and the dealer may request administrative review of the decision. The dealer may re-register after one year, but will be permanently barred after three revocations.
The proposed regs would provide that a dealer could not administratively appeal the IRS’s decisions relating to the suspension or revocation of a dealer’s registration unless the IRS and the IRS Independent Office of Appeals agree that such review is available and the IRS provides the time and manner for the review.
Comments Requested
The IRS requests comments on the proposed regs. Comments and requests for a public hearing must be received by December 11, 2023. They may be mailed to the IRS, or submitted electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS andREG-113064-23).
Effect on Other Documents
Rev. Proc. 2023-33 supersedes in partRev. Proc. 2022-42, I.R.B. 2022-52 , 565.
The IRS has released the 2023-2024special per diem rates. Taxpayers use the per diem rates to substantiate certain expenses incurred while traveling away from home. These special per diem rates include:
The IRS hasreleasedthe2023-2024special per diem rates. Taxpayers use the per diem rates to substantiate certain expenses incurred while traveling away from home. Thesespecial per diem ratesinclude:
1. the special transportation industry meal and incidental expenses (M&IE) rates,
2. the rate for the incidental expenses only deduction,
3. and the rates and list of high-cost localities for purposes of the high-low substantiation method.
Transportation IndustrySpecial Per Diem Rates
The special M&IE rates for taxpayers in the transportation industry are:
$69 for any locality of travel in the continental United States (CONUS), and
$74 for any locality of travel outside the continental United States (OCONUS).
Incidental Expenses Only Rate
The rate is $5 per day for any CONUS or OCONUS travel for the incidental expenses only deduction.
High-Low Substantiation Method
For purposes of the high-low substantiation method, the2023-2024special per diem ratesare:
$309 for travel to any high-cost locality, and
$214 for travel to any other locality within CONUS.
The amount treated as paid for meals is:
$74 for travel to any high-cost locality, and
$64 for travel to any other locality within CONUS
Instead of the meal and incidental expenses only substantiation method, taxpayers may use:
$74 for travel to any high-cost locality, and
$64 for travel to any other locality within CONUS.
Taxpayers using the high-low method must comply withRev. Proc. 2019-48, I.R.B. 2019-51, 1390. That procedure provides the rules for using a per diem rate to substantiate the amount of ordinary and necessary business expenses paid or incurred while traveling away from home.
The IRS provided guidance on the new energy efficient home credit, as amended by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-169). The guidance largely reiterates the statutory requirements for the credit, but it provides some new details regarding definitions, certifications and substantiation.
TheIRSprovided guidance on thenew energy efficient home credit, asamendedby the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-169). The guidance largely reiterates the statutoryrequirementsfor the credit, but it provides some new details regarding definitions, certifications and substantiation.
Definitions
For purposes of therequirementthat a home must be acquired from an eligible contractor, a home leased from the contractor for use as a residence is considered acquired from the contractor. However, a home the contractor retains for use as a residence is not acquired from the contractor. A manufactured home may be acquired directly from the contractor, or indirectly from an intermediary that acquired it from the contractor and then sold or leased it to a buyer for use as a residence, or to intervening intermediaries that eventually sold it to a buyer for use as a residence.
For a constructed home, the eligible contractor is the person that built and owned the home and had a basis in it during its construction. For a manufactured home, the eligible contractor is the person that produced the home and owned and had a basis in it during its production.
The United States includes only the states and the District of Columbia.
Certifications
A dwelling unit that is certified under the applicable Energy Star program is considered to meet the programrequirementsfor purposes of the credit. Similarly, a dwelling unit that is certified under the Zero Energy Ready Home (ZERH) program is deemed to meet therequirementsfor the credit for a ZERH. The ZERH program in effect for purposes of the credit is the one in effect as of the date identified on the Department of Energy’s ZERH webpage athttps://www.energy.gov/eere/buildings/doe-zero-energy-ready-home-zerh-program-requirements.
The eligible contractor must obtain the appropriate Energy Star or ZERH certification before claiming the credit. The contractor should keep the certification with its tax records, but does not have to file it with the return that claims the credit.
Rules for homes acquired before 2023, under which eligible certifiers could certify a home and contractors could use approved software to calculate a new home’s energy consumption, do not apply to a home acquired after 2022.
Substantiation
To substantiate the credit, the contractor must retain in its tax records, at a minimum, the home's Energy Star or ZERH certification, including its date; and records sufficient to establish:
the address of the qualified home and its location in the United States;
the taxpayer’s status as an eligible contractor;
the acquisition of the home from the taxpayer for use as a residence, including the name of the person who acquired it; and
if applicable, proof that the prevailing wagerequirementswere met.
However, for a manufactured home the contractor sells to a dealer, a safe harbor allows the contractor to rely on a statement by the dealer to establish the date the home was acquired, its location in the United States, and its acquisition for use as a residence. The statement must:
Specify the date of the retail sale of the manufactured home, state that the dealer delivered it to the purchaser at an address in the United States, and provide that the dealer has no knowledge of any information suggesting that the purchaser will use the manufactured home other than as a residence;
Provide the name, address and telephone number of the dealer and any intervening intermediaries; and
Declare, under penalties of perjury, that the dealer statement and any accompanying documents are true, correct and complete.
Effect on Other Documents
Notice 2008-35, 2008-1 CB 647, andNotice 2008-36, 2008-1 CB 650, are obsoleted for qualified homes acquired after December 31, 2022.
The IRS identified drought-strickenareas where taxrelief is available to taxpayers that sold or exchanged livestock because of drought. The relief extends the deadlines for taxpayers to replace the livestock and avoid reporting gain on the sales. These extensions apply until the drought-strickenarea has a drought-free year.
TheIRSidentifieddrought-strickenareaswheretaxreliefis available to taxpayers that sold or exchangedlivestockbecause of drought. Thereliefextends the deadlines for taxpayers to replace thelivestockand avoid reporting gain on thesales. These extensions apply until thedrought-strickenareahas a drought-free year.
WhenSalesofLivestockareInvoluntaryConversions
Salesoflivestockdue to drought areinvoluntaryconversions of property. Taxpayers can postpone gain oninvoluntaryconversions if they buy qualified replacement property during the replacement period. Qualified replacement property must be similar or related in service or use to the converted property.
Usually, the replacement period ends two years after thetaxyear in which theinvoluntaryconversion occurs. However, a longer replacement period applies in several situations, such as whensalesoccur in adrought-strickenarea.
LivestockSold Because of Weather
Taxpayers have four years to replacelivestockthey sold or exchanged solely because of drought, flood, or other weather condition. Three conditions apply.
First, thelivestockcannot be raised for slaughter, held for sporting purposes or be poultry.
Second, the taxpayer must have held the convertedlivestockfor:
draft,
dairy, or
breeeding purposes.
Third, the weather condition must make theareaeligible for federal assistance.
Persistent Drought
TheIRSextends the four-year replacement period when a taxpayer sells or exchangeslivestockdue to persistent drought. The extension continues until the taxpayer’s region experiences a drought-free year.
The first drought-free year is the first 12-month period that:
ends on August 31 in or after the last year of the four-year replacement period, and
does not include any weekly period of drought.
WhatAreasare Suffering from Drought
The National Drought Mitigation Center produces weekly Drought Monitor maps that reportdrought-strickenareas. Taxpayers can view these maps at
However, theIRSalso provided a list ofareaswhere the year ending on August 31, 2023, was not a drought-free year. The replacement period in theseareaswill continue until theareahas a drought-free year.
With the Internal Revenue Service announcing more details on how it will be targeting America’s wealthiest taxpayers, Kostelanetz’s Megan Brackney offered up some advice on preparing for increased compliance activity.
With theInternal Revenue Serviceannouncing more details on how it will be targeting America’s wealthiest taxpayers, Kostelanetz’s Megan Brackney offered up some advice on preparing forincreasedcomplianceactivity.
The first step, especially for those that fall within the agency’s announced parameters for who is being targeted, is to review recent tax filings. The agency announced in September it would be targeting large partnerships.
"I would say to look back over the last three years because that’s the typical statute of limitations period for theIRStoauditand assess, maybe look back even a little bit longer,"Brackney, partner at the law firm, said in an interview.
In particular, she recommended a focus on major financial transactions.
"Look at significant transactions and make sure that you have all the substantiation because a lot of times, the issue isn’t so much a legal question or anything to complex,"she continued."It’s just whether or not you know [for example if] the partnership sold an asset, do they actually have records that substantiate their basis?"
Brackney expects that after the agency completes its work on the largest partnerships, it will continue this kind of compliance work on those high earning partnerships that may be outside of the original targeted thresholds.
Other things to start thinking about if you are a large partnership is how you plan to respond to anauditif you end up targeted for enforcement action by theIRS, especially if you have significant transactions that might draw extra scrutiny. Some questions to ponder are whether you have the in-house expertise to handle anauditor if you plan on going to an outside source.
"Nobody is going to do those things until they are actuallyaudited, but its good to start thinking about it and planning it,"she said."And if you do have a really significant transaction, maybe go ahead and have someone take a look at it already to make sure it is properly documented."
She also suggested that if a partnership finds an error as they look back on their own to go ahead and correct it with theIRSbefore the agency"is poking around and looking at it."
Training Concerns
And while theIRSis moving forward with its plans toaudithigh earning partnerships, Brackney expressed some concerns relative to agent training.
She recalled a few years ago when theIRSannounced global high net worthauditsprogram that ended up collecting very little.
"Most of thoseauditsresulted in no change letters,"Brackney said,"which is wild because youaudita normal middle-class taxpayer with a Schedule C business, you are going to have a change [and] not because anybody is trying to cheat. There is going to be something that they can’t substantiate."
She said it was hard to understand how most of the global high net worthauditshad no changes, and expressed some concerns that this could happen again, but is hopeful that with the agency’s supplemental funding from the Inflation Reduction Act will come proper training to handle the complexities of reviewing these tax returns.
"I support theIRSbeing fully funded,"she said."It’s good for tax administration and it makes a fairer society because it’s not like people are just getting away with stuff because theIRSdoesn’t have the resources."
The IRS has cautioned taxpayers to be vigilant about promotions involving exaggeratedartdonationdeductions that may target high-income individuals and has also provided valuable tips to help people steer clear of falling into such schemes. Taxpayers can legitimately claim artdonations, but dishonest promoters may employ direct solicitation to make unrealistically promising offers. In a bid to boost compliance and protect taxpayers from scams, the IRS has active promoter investigations and taxpayer audits underway in this area.
TheIRShas cautioned taxpayers to be vigilant about promotions involvingexaggeratedartdonationdeductionsthat may target high-income individuals and has also provided valuable tips to help people steer clear of falling into such schemes. Taxpayers can legitimately claimartdonations, but dishonest promoters may employ direct solicitation to make unrealistically promising offers. In a bid to boost compliance and protect taxpayers from scams, theIRShas active promoter investigations and taxpayer audits underway in this area.
Also, theIRShas employed various compliance tools, including tax return audits and civil penalty investigations, to combat abusiveartdonations. Taxpayers, especially high-income individuals, are advised to watch out for aggressive promotions. Additionally, following Inflation Reduction Act funding theIRShas intensified the efforts to ensure accurate tax payments from high-income and high-wealth individuals.
The Service has advised taxpayers to watch-out for the following red flags:
Be wary of purchasing multiple works by the same artist with little market value beyond what promoters claim.
Watch for specific appraisers arranged by promoters, as their appraisals often lack crucial details.
Taxpayers are responsible for accurate tax reporting, and engaging in tax avoidance schemes can lead to penalties, interest, fines, and even imprisonment.
Charities should also be cautious not to inadvertently support these schemes.
In order to to properly claim a charitable contributiondeductionfor anartdonation, a taxpayer must keep records to prove:
Name and address of the charitable organization that received theart.
Date and location of the contribution.
Detailed description of the donatedart.
Also, TheIRShas a team of trained appraisers inArtAppraisal Serviceswho provide assistance and advice to theIRSand taxpayers on valuation questions in connection with personal property and works ofart.
Finally, the taxpayers can report tax-related illegal activities relating to charitable contributions ofartusing:
Form 14242, Report Suspected Abusive Tax Promotions or Preparers, to report a suspected abusive tax avoidance scheme and tax return preparers who promote such schemes.
The fate of many of the tax incentives taxpayers have grown accustomed to over recent years will likely remain up in the air until Congress and the Administration finally face off weeks before year-end 2012. While the results of Election Day will have bearing on the outcome, no crystal ball can predict how the ultimate short-term compromise will unfold. As a result, some year-end tax planning must be deferred and executed ”at the eleventh hour” only after Congress passes and the President signs what will likely result in a stopgap, temporary compromise for 2013. Tax rates for higher-bracket individuals and a long list of “extenders” provisions such as the child tax credit, the enhanced education credits and the optional deduction for state and local sales tax, hang in the balance. Real tax reform for 2014 and beyond, in any event, won’t be hammered out until 2013 is well underway.
The fate of many of the tax incentives taxpayers have grown accustomed to over recent years will likely remain up in the air until Congress and the Administration finally face off weeks before year-end 2012. While the results of Election Day will have bearing on the outcome, no crystal ball can predict how the ultimate short-term compromise will unfold. As a result, some year-end tax planning must be deferred and executed ”at the eleventh hour” only after Congress passes and the President signs what will likely result in a stopgap, temporary compromise for 2013. Tax rates for higher-bracket individuals and a long list of “extenders” provisions such as the child tax credit, the enhanced education credits and the optional deduction for state and local sales tax, hang in the balance. Real tax reform for 2014 and beyond, in any event, won’t be hammered out until 2013 is well underway.
Traditional Planning for Individuals
2012 year-end legislation clearly plays a major role in 2012 year-end tax planning for many taxpayer. Nevertheless, traditional year-end tax planning should not be overlooked in the meantime. In many cases, attention to traditional considerations, now, will prove more important to a majority of taxpayers’ bottom line. Here is a checklist of some traditional year-end planning considerations not to be overlooked:
Changes in filing status: marriage, divorce, death of a spouse, or a change in head-of-household status during 2012 (or anticipated for 2013) will impact on your tax bracket and bottom line tax liability. Anticipate the additional expense or lower tax bill that a change in filing status may bring.
Birth of a child, adoption, combined families through re-marriage, and even the ages of children in 2012 and 2013 can matter to year-end tax planning. Dependency exemptions in some instances depend upon the amount of support provided within the tax year. The ability to take advantage of the child tax credit, the child-care credit, the earned income credit, application of the kiddie tax, and the ability to be covered under a parent’s health insurance under the new health care law in part hinges upon how a “child” is defined within certain age limits (varying from under age 13, to under age 17, 19, 24 or 26, depending upon the provision).
Retirement and semi-retirement is also a major event for tax purposes for which first-year “required minimum distributions” from retirement savings must be calculated and made. Also an important year-end consideration for the newly retired is facing what is typically an entirely new matrix of investment income considerations focused on “smoothing” the amount of income and deductions among several years to achieve maximum tax results.
Timing the recognition of capital gains and losses is important, in particular to maximize offsetting short-term gains (that are tax at ordinary income rates) with short-term losses. Also especially relevant to 2012 year-end timing of capital gains and losses is the introduction of a 3.8 percent Medicare contributions tax that will be assessed on excess net investment income starting in 2013.
Projecting available itemized deductions for 2012, then controlling whether a better tax result might take place by deferring or accelerating some of those deductions, is frequently important. Some taxpayers who are close to the amount of their standard deduction amount may want to load deductions into a single year, say 2013, so they have enough to itemize deductions for that year, while still be entitled to the maximum amount of their standard deduction into an adjacent year (2012 in our example). Other taxpayers need to be aware of alternative minimum tax (AMT) exposure in which many deductions become cut back or eliminated.
Unusual expenses that may generate an atypical deduction or credit, such as emergency medical expenses, moving expenses, or unemployment and job-search expenses, may need special attention. In connection with medical expenses, and particularly relevant to 2012 year-end planning, is the increase in the floor on deductible medical expenses from 7.5 percent adjusted gross income (AGI) in 2012 to 10 percent AGI in 2013 (7.5 percent for those who reach 65 years of age by the close of the tax year).
Gift giving, both charitable and for estate planning purposes, usually reaches a high point at year end and for good reason. In addition to better knowing what assets remain available for gifting (or what income needs offsetting with a charitable deduction), certain tax benefits cannot be accumulated but must be used or lost each year. For example, the $13,000 annual gift tax exclusion per recipient cannot be carried over and used in addition to the $14,000 gift tax exclusion that will be available in 2013. A gift of $13,000 on December 31, 2012 and a $14,000 gift on January 1, 2013, for example, amount to a $27,000 tax-free gift; while a $27,000 gift all on January 1, 2013 will subject $13,000 of that gift to potential gift tax. A charitable gift can frequently require the same timing finesse, for example, if donors find themselves in a higher tax bracket in a particular year or not being able to otherwise itemize deductions.
Traditional Planning for Businesses
Businesses also face some traditional strategic decisions that often can only be made at year-end:
Capital purchases that qualify for accelerated depreciation, bonus depreciation or so-called Section 179 expensing should be timed to fall into the current or the upcoming year, as the overall profit and loss of a business dictates. “Placed in service” requirements in addition to timing the purchase of equipment also apply to maximizing tax benefits.
Determination of whether a business is on the cash or accrual method of accounting for tax purposes is also critical to year-end business strategies. Businesses using the cash basis method of accounting recognize and report income when the business actually or constructively receives cash or its equivalent; for accrual-basis taxpayers, generally the right to receive income, rather than actual receipt, determines the year of inclusion of income.
Compensation and shareholder or partner distributions from a business, and drawing the often fine line between the two, can make a considerable difference to a business owner’s overall tax liability for the year. Differences often hinge upon whether self-employment tax is paid, or whether a distribution is taxed as ordinary income or at the capital gains rate.
Determining the difference between ordinary business activities and passive activities before implementing a year-end strategy also just makes good sense. Rental income or losses, and other passive activity gains and losses, must be netted separately from business gains and losses. Year-end timing for one does not necessarily help control your bottom-line tax cost on the other.
Please contact us if you have any questions about how traditional year-end planning might benefit your bottom line. Once Congress acts on year-end tax legislation this year, we also suggest that most taxpayers consider what steps may then be taken before the 2012 tax year closes to mitigate against any unfavorable new tax provisions.
The tax code provides for 50 percent first-year bonus depreciation for 2012. If property qualifies for bonus depreciation, the taxpayer can deduct 50 percent of the cost of the property in 2012. This can help a business bear the cost of investing in needed equipment, as well as facilitate cash flow and provide operating funds for the business. It is not too late to qualify for 50-percent bonus depreciation for 2012.
The tax code provides for 50 percent first-year bonus depreciation for 2012. If property qualifies for bonus depreciation, the taxpayer can deduct 50 percent of the cost of the property in 2012. This can help a business bear the cost of investing in needed equipment, as well as facilitate cash flow and provide operating funds for the business. It is not too late to qualify for 50-percent bonus depreciation for 2012.
In 2011, bonus depreciation was 100 percent. There have been proposals to reinstate 100 percent bonus depreciation for 2012, but they have not been acted on. For 2012, 50 percent bonus depreciation is available. It expires at the end of 2012 and is not available for 2013. (Note that certain longer production-period property and transportation property still qualifies for 100 percent bonus depreciation if it is acquired and placed in service during 2012.)
Qualified property must be depreciable under the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) and have a recovery period of 20 years or less. Qualified property also includes computer software, water utility property, and qualified leasehold improvement property. The property generally has to be depreciable under MACRS; thus, intangible assets amortized over 15 years do not qualify for bonus depreciation.
There are other requirements for taking 50-percent bonus depreciation in 2012. The original use of the property must begin with the taxpayer. The property must be new, must be acquired before January 1, 2013 (title must pass), and must be placed in service before January 1, 2013. Being placed in service requires that the property be installed and ready for use in the business. The property must be in a condition or state of readiness to be used on a regular, ongoing basis. The property must be available for a specifically assigned function in the trade or business.
The original use is the first use to which the property is put. That, if a taxpayer purchases used property from another business, the property will not qualify for bonus depreciation. However, if the taxpayer makes additional expenditures to recondition or rebuild acquired property, these expenses can satisfy the original use requirement. A person who acquires new property for personal use and then converts it to business use is still considered the original user of the property.
The acquisition date rules require that there not be a written binding contract in effort before January 1, 2008 to acquire the property. Property can qualify if the taxpayer entered into a written binding contract for its acquisition after December 31, 2007 and before January 1, 2013. Self-manufactured property can qualify if the taxpayer begins manufacturing, constructing or producing the property before January 1, 2013. Property is deemed acquired when reduced to physical possession or control. Regardless of the manner of acquisition, the property must be placed in service before January 1, 2013.
If the business does not have profits in the current year, it can use the bonus depreciation deduction to create a net operating loss, which can then be carried back (or forward) to a profitable year and generate a refund. However, bonus depreciation is not mandatory. Taxpayers may choose to elect out of bonus depreciation, so that they can spread depreciation deductions more evenly over future years.
If you need further assistance in arranging any capital purchases for your business to qualify for bonus depreciation before it sunsets at the end of 2012, please contact this office.
In recent years, the IRS has been cracking down on abuses of the tax deduction for donations to charity and contributions of used vehicles have been especially scrutinized. The charitable contribution rules, however, are far from being easy to understand. Many taxpayers genuinely are confused by the rules and unintentionally value their contributions to charity at amounts higher than appropriate.
In recent years, the IRS has been cracking down on abuses of the tax deduction for donations to charity and contributions of used vehicles have been especially scrutinized. The charitable contribution rules, however, are far from being easy to understand. Many taxpayers genuinely are confused by the rules and unintentionally value their contributions to charity at amounts higher than appropriate.
Vehicle donations
According to the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), there are approximately 250 million registered passenger motor vehicles in the United States. The U.S. is the largest passenger vehicle market in the world. Potentially, each one of these vehicles could be a charitable donation and that is why the IRS takes such a sharp look at contributions of used vehicles and claims for tax deductions. The possibility for abuse of the charitable contribution rules is large.
Bona fide charities
Before looking at the tax rules, there is an important starting point. To claim a tax deduction, your contribution must be to a bona fide charitable organization. Only certain categories of exempt organizations are eligible to receive tax-deductible charitable contributions.
Many charitable organizations are so-called “501(c)(3)” organizations (named after the section of the Tax Code that governs charities. The IRS maintains a list of qualified Code Sec. 501(c)(3) organizations. Not all charitable organizations are Code Sec. 501(c)(3)s. Churches, synagogues, temples, and mosques, for example, are not required to file for Code Sec. 501(c)(3) status. Special rules also apply to fraternal organizations, volunteer fire departments and veterans organizations. If you have any questions about a charitable organization, please contact our office.
Tax rules
In past years, many taxpayers would value the amount of their used vehicle donation based on information in a buyer’s guide. Today, the value of your used vehicle donation depends on what the charitable organization does with the vehicle.
In many cases, the charitable organization will sell your used vehicle. If the charity sells the vehicle, your tax deduction is limited to the gross proceeds that the charity receives from the sale. The charitable organization must certify that the vehicle was sold in an arm’s length transaction between unrelated parties and identify the date the vehicle was sold by the charity and the amount of the gross proceeds.
There are exceptions to the rule that your tax deduction is limited to the gross proceeds that the charity receives from the sale of your used vehicle. You may be able to deduct the vehicle’s fair market value if the charity intends to make a significant intervening use of the vehicle, a material improvement to the vehicle, or give or sell the vehicle to a qualified needy individual. If you have any questions about what a charity intends to do with your vehicle, please contact our office.
Written acknowledgment
The charitable organization must give you a written acknowledgment of your used vehicle donation. The rules differ depending on the amount of your donation. If you claim a deduction of more than $500 but not more than $5,000 for your vehicle donation, the written acknowledgment from the charity must:
Identify the charity’s name, the date and location of the donation
Describe the vehicle
Include a statement as to whether the charity provided any goods or services in return for the car other than intangible religious benefits and, if so, a description and good faith estimate of the value of the goods and services
Identify your name and taxpayer identification number
Provide the vehicle identification number
The written acknowledgement generally must be provided to you within 30 days of the sale of the vehicle. Alternatively, the charitable organization may in certain cases, provide you a completed Form 1098-C, Contributions of Motor Vehicles, Boats, and Airplanes, that contains the same information.
The written acknowledgment requirements for claiming a deduction under $500 or over $5,000 are similar to the ones described above but there are some differences. For example, if your deduction is expected to be more than $5,000 and not limited to the gross proceeds from the sale of your used vehicle, you must obtain a written appraisal of the vehicle. Our office can help guide you through the many steps of donating a vehicle valued at more than $5,000.
If you are planning to donate a used vehicle, please contact our office and we can discuss the tax rules in more detail.
In 2013, a new and unique tax will take effect—a 3.8 percent "unearned income Medicare contribution" tax as part of the structure in place to pay for health care reform. The tax will be imposed on the "net investment income" (NII) of individuals, estates, and trusts that exceeds specified thresholds. The tax will generally fall on passive income, but will also apply generally to capital gains from the disposition of property.
In 2013, a new and unique tax will take effect—a 3.8 percent "unearned income Medicare contribution" tax as part of the structure in place to pay for health care reform. The tax will be imposed on the "net investment income" (NII) of individuals, estates, and trusts that exceeds specified thresholds. The tax will generally fall on passive income, but will also apply generally to capital gains from the disposition of property.
Specified thresholds
For an individual, the tax will apply to the lesser of the taxpayer's NII, or the amount of "modified" adjusted gross income (AGI with foreign income added back) above a specified threshold, which is:
$250,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly and a surviving spouse;
$125,000 for married taxpayers filing separately;
$200,000 for single and head of household taxpayers.
Examples. A single taxpayer has modified AGI of $220,000, including NII of $30,000. The tax applies to the lesser of $30,000 or ($220,000 minus $200,000), the specified threshold for single taxpayers. Thus, the tax applies to $20,000.
A single taxpayer has modified AGI of $150,000, including $60,000 of NII. Because the taxpayer's income is below the $200,000 threshold, the taxpayer does not owe the tax, despite having substantial NII.
For an estate or trust, the tax applies to the lesser of undistributed net income, or the excess of AGI over the dollar amount for the highest tax rate bracket for estates and trusts ($11,950 for 2013). Thus, the tax applies to a much lower amount for trusts and estates.
Application of tax
The tax applies to interest, dividends, annuities, royalties, and rents, and capital gains, unless derived from a trade or business. The tax also applies to income and gains from a passive trade or business.
Other items are excluded from NII and from the tax: distributions from IRAs, pensions, 401(k) plans, tax-sheltered annuities, and eligible 457 plans, for example. Items that are totally excluded from gross income, such as distributions from a Roth IRA and interest on tax-exempt bonds, are excluded both from NII and from modified AGI.
The tax does not apply to nonresident aliens, charitable trusts, or corporations.
Tax planning techniques
Taxpayers are concerned about having to pay the tax. One technique for avoiding the tax is to sell off capital gain property in 2012, before the tax applies. This can be particularly useful if the taxpayer is facing a large capital gain from the sale of a principal residence (after taking the $250,000/$500,000 exclusion from income). Older taxpayers who do not want to sell their property may want to consider holding on to appreciated property until death, when the property gets a fair market value basis without being subject to income tax.
The technique of "gain harvesting" may be even more attractive if tax rates increase on dividends, capital gains, and AGI in 2013, with the potential expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts. However, the status of these tax rates will not be determined until after the election, potentially in a lame-duck Congressional session. It is also possible that Congress will simply extend existing tax rates for another year and "punt" the decision until 2013, as tax reform discussions heat up.
Taxpayers may also want to change the source of their income. Investing in tax-exempt bonds will be more attractive, since the interest income does not enter into AGI or NII. Converting a 401(k) account or traditional IRA to a Roth IRA will accomplish the same purpose. Income from a Roth conversion is not net investment income, although the income will increase modified AGI, which may put other income in danger of being subject to the 3.8 percent tax. Increasing deductible or pre-tax contributions to existing retirement plans can also lower income and help the taxpayer stay below the applicable threshold.
Trusts and estates should make a point of distributing their income to their beneficiaries. A trust's NII will be taxed at a low threshold (less than $12,000), while the income received by a beneficiary is taxed only if the much higher $200,000/$250,000 thresholds are exceeded.
Uncertainty
There was some uncertainty about the tax taking effect because of litigation challenging the health care law providing the tax, but a June 2012 Supreme Court decision upheld the law. The application of the tax is also uncertain because the Republican leadership has vowed to pursue repeal of the health care law if the Republicans win the presidency and take control of both houses of Congress in the November 2012 elections. But this is speculative. In the meantime, the Supreme Court decision guarantees that the tax will take effect on January 1, 2013.
These can be difficult decisions. While economic considerations for managing assets and income are important, it also makes sense for a taxpayer to look at the tax impact if the certain asset sales or shifts in investment portfolios are otherwise being considered.
Whether or not the IRS will allow a deduction for year-end bonuses for services performed during that year depends not only on the timing of the payment, but also the events surrounding the payment. If your business is planning to provide year-end bonuses to employees, you may find the following tax tips useful in your planning.
Whether or not the IRS will allow a deduction for year-end bonuses for services performed during that year depends not only on the timing of the payment, but also the events surrounding the payment. If your business is planning to provide year-end bonuses to employees, you may find the following tax tips useful in your planning.
The "All Events" test
Code Sec. 461(a) provides that the amount of any deduction for employee bonuses must be taken for the proper tax year as determined under the method of accounting the taxpayer uses to compute taxable income. (The two most common methods are the cash method and the accrual method, the latter of which allows taxpayers to include income items when earned and claim deductions when expenses are incurred.)
Under the accrual method of accounting, the three-prong "All events" test is used to determine the tax year in which a liability-in this case the year-end employee bonuses—is incurred. The prongs are:
Have all the events have occurred that establish the fact of the liability?
Can the amount of the liability be determined with reasonable accuracy?
Has economic performance occurred for the liability?
Approval and retention provisions
Some year-end bonus plans are structured with certain conditions attached to payment. For example, some bonus plans provide that payment cannot occur until formally approved. In such cases, the fact of the liability may not be established, and the employer may need to wait a year before being able to deduct the bonus amount.
Other plans specify that bonus payments cannot be made if an employee has left employment at year-end. In this case as well, questions arise as to whether liability for the bonuses has been fixed at the end of the year in which the employee's services were performed.
Deferred compensation
Generally, Code Sec. 404 states that, an employer may not deduct deferred compensation paid to an employee until the employee includes it in income. However, a bonus received within a 2 1/2-month period after the end of the tax year in which the employee has rendered its services is not considered deferred compensation. The employer should be able to claim a tax deduction for the bonus in the tax year during which the services were rendered provided that the liability meets the all events test. If the employee receives the deferred amount more than 2 1/2 months after the close of the employer's taxable year, the payment is presumed to have been made under a deferred compensation plan.
If you think you might be interested in structuring a year-end bonus plan specific to your business, please feel free to contact this office for an appointment.
As 2013 draws closer, news reports about “taxmageddon” and “taxpocalypse,” describing expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts, are proliferating. Many taxpayers are asking what they can do to prepare. The answer is to prepare early. September may seem too early to be discussing year-end tax planning, but the uncertainty over the Bush-era tax cuts, incentives for businesses, and much more, requires proactive strategizing. Ultimately, the fate of these tax incentives will be resolved; until then, taxpayers need to be flexible in their year-end tax planning.
As 2013 draws closer, news reports about “taxmageddon” and “taxpocalypse,” describing expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts, are proliferating. Many taxpayers are asking what they can do to prepare. The answer is to prepare early. September may seem too early to be discussing year-end tax planning, but the uncertainty over the Bush-era tax cuts, incentives for businesses, and much more, requires proactive strategizing. Ultimately, the fate of these tax incentives will be resolved; until then, taxpayers need to be flexible in their year-end tax planning.
Individuals
In less than three months, the individual income tax rates are scheduled without further action to automatically increase across-the-board, with the highest rate jumping from 35 percent to 39.6 percent. Additionally, the current tax-favorable capital gains and dividends tax rates are scheduled to expire. Higher income taxpayers will also be subject to revived limitations on itemized deductions and their personal exemptions. The child tax credit, one of the most popular incentives in the tax code, will be cut in half. Millions of taxpayers are predicted to be liable for the alternative minimum tax (AMT) because of expiration of the AMT “patch.” Countless other incentives for individuals will either disappear or be substantially reduced after 2012.
In July, the House and Senate passed competing bills to extend many of these expiring incentives one more year (through 2013). No further action is expected on these bills until after the November elections. However, they do signal a highly probable temporary solution to the fate of the Bush-era tax cuts. Regardless of which party wins the White House and Congress, the probability of a one-year extension of the Bush-era tax cuts appears high.
Along with expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts, the two percent payroll tax holiday for 2012 is scheduled to expire. For individuals with income at or above the Social Security wage base for 2012 ($110,100), the payroll tax holiday represented a $2,202 savings. Unlike the Bush-era tax cuts, an extension of the payroll tax holiday is unlikely.
Putting aside the Bush-era tax cuts and the payroll tax holiday for a moment, two new taxes are scheduled to take effect after 2012: an additional 0.9 percent Medicare tax on wages and self-employment income and a 3.8 percent Medicare contribution tax on unearned income. Both new taxes are targeted to individuals with incomes over $200,000 (families with incomes over $250,000). One important misconception about the 3.8 percent Medicare tax is that it is a direct real estate tax. Taxpayers that dispose of real estate may be exempt from the tax either because of income limitations or because of an exclusion provided for primary residence home sales. However, certain high-end homes may feel the sting of the 3.8 percent tax on some or all of the gain realized. Despite some rumblings in the GOP-controlled House, it is unlikely the new Medicare taxes will be repealed before 2013.
All these provisions can be seen as the perfect storm. Year-end tax planning takes on new urgency because of the uncertainty. Some variations on traditional year-end planning techniques may be valuable. Instead of shifting income into a future year, taxpayers may want to recognize income in 2012, when lower tax rates are available, rather than shift income to 2013. The same strategy may apply to recognizing income from capital gains and dividends. Another valuable year-end strategy is to “run the numbers” for regular tax liability and AMT liability. Taxpayers may want to explore if certain deductions should be more evenly divided between 2012 and 2013, and which deductions may qualify, or will not be as valuable, for AMT purposes. Additionally, keep in mind the new Medicare taxes and how they will impact investments and possibly home sales.
Estate tax planning is also in flux. Under current law, the maximum estate tax rate is 35 percent with an applicable exclusion amount of $5 million (indexed for inflation) for decedents dying before January 1, 2013. Unless Congress acts, the estate tax will revert to its less generous pre-2001 rates. Gift and generation-skipping transfer (GST) taxes also will revert to their pre-2001 rates.
Businesses
Businesses are also confronted with uncertainty in tax planning as 2012 ends. Special incentives, such as bonus depreciation, enhanced Code Sec. 179 expensing and a host of business tax extenders, may be unavailable after 2012.
Under current law, 50-percent bonus depreciation applies to qualified property acquired and placed in service after December 31, 2011 and before January 1, 2013 (January 1, 2014 for certain property). For tax years beginning in 2012, the Code Sec, 179 expensing dollar limitation is $139,000 and the investment ceiling is $560,000 for tax years beginning in 2012. After 2012, 50-percent bonus depreciation is scheduled to expire (except for certain property) and the Code Sec. 179 expensing dollar limitation will drop to $25,000 with a $200,000 investment ceiling.
Enhanced Code Sec. 179 expensing is a good candidate for extension after 2012, but at less generous amounts. In July, the Senate approved a Code Sec. 179 dollar amount of $250,000 and an $800,000 investment limitation for tax years beginning after December 31, 2012. The House approved a Code Sec. 179 dollar amount of $100,000 and a $400,000 investment limitation after 2012.
The list of expired business tax extenders is long. The expired incentives include the research tax credit, special expensing for film and television productions, the employer wage credit for military reservists, and many more. A host of related energy incentives have also expired and are awaiting renewal. Unlike past years, Congress is not expected to routinely extend all of the expired provisions. The more widely utilized incentives are likely to be extended; some lesser used incentives may not.
Businesses do have some good news in year-end planning. Temporary “repair” regulations issued in late 2011 include a valuable de minimis rule, which could enable taxpayers to expense otherwise capitalized tangible property. Qualified taxpayers may claim a current deduction for the cost of acquiring items of relatively low-cost property, including materials and supplies, if specific requirements are met. The aggregate cost which may be expensed annually under a taxpayer’s expensing policy is subject to a ceiling equal to the greater of 0.1 percent of gross receipts or two percent of total depreciation and amortization reported on the financial statement.
Businesses should also explore the Code Sec. 199 domestic production activities deduction. This deduction, unlike many other incentives, is permanent and will not expire after 2012. The deduction allows qualified taxpayers to deduct an amount equal to the lesser of a phased-in percentage of taxable income (adjusted gross income for individuals) or qualified production activities income. A taxpayer’s Code Sec. 199 deduction cannot exceed one-half (50 percent) of the W-2 wages paid by the taxpayer during the year.
Sequestration
The fate of the Bush-era tax cuts and the other incentives is linked to sequestration. The Budget Control Act of 2011 imposes across-the-board spending cuts starting in 2013. Many lawmakers want to postpone or repeal the spending cuts but savings must be recouped somehow. Several energy tax incentives, especially for oil and gas producers, have been viewed as likely candidates for elimination to offset repeal of the Budget Control Act.
Please contact our office if you have any questions about the incentives we discussed and how you can develop a year-end tax plan that responds to the current climate of uncertainty.
Some individuals must pay estimated taxes or face a penalty in the form of interest on the amount underpaid. Self-employed persons, retirees, and nonworking individuals most often must pay estimated taxes to avoid the penalty. But an employee may need to pay them if the amount of tax withheld from wages is insufficient to cover the tax owed on other income. The potential tax owed on investment income also may increase the need for paying estimated tax, even among wage earners.
Some individuals must pay estimated taxes or face a penalty in the form of interest on the amount underpaid. Self-employed persons, retirees, and nonworking individuals most often must pay estimated taxes to avoid the penalty. But an employee may need to pay them if the amount of tax withheld from wages is insufficient to cover the tax owed on other income. The potential tax owed on investment income also may increase the need for paying estimated tax, even among wage earners.
The trick with estimated taxes is to pay a sufficient amount of estimated tax to avoid a penalty but not to overpay. The IRS will refund the overpayment when you file your return, but it will not pay interest on it. In other words, by overpaying tax to the IRS, you are in essence choosing to give the government an interest-free loan rather than invest your money somewhere else and make a profit.
When do I make estimated tax payments?
Individual estimated tax payments are generally made in four installments accompanying a completed Form 1040-ES, Estimated Tax for Individuals. For the typical individual who uses a calendar tax year, payments generally are due on April 15, June 15, and September 15 of the tax year, and January 15 of the following year (or the following business day when it falls on a weekend or other holiday).
Am I required to make estimated tax payments?
Generally, you must pay estimated taxes in 2012 if (1) you expect to owe at least $1,000 in tax after subtracting tax withholding (if you have any) and (2) you expect your withholding and credits to be less than the smaller of 90 percent of your 2012 taxes or 100 percent of the tax on your 2011 return. There are special rules for higher income individuals.
Usually, there is no penalty if your estimated tax payments plus other tax payments, such as wage withholding, equal either 100 percent of your prior year's tax liability or 90 percent of your current year's tax liability. However, if your adjusted gross income for your prior year exceeded $150,000, you must pay either 110 percent of the prior year tax or 90 percent of the current year tax to avoid the estimated tax penalty. For married filing separately, the higher payments apply at $75,000.
Estimated tax is not limited to income tax. In figuring your installments, you must also take into account other taxes such as the alternative minimum tax, penalties for early withdrawals from an IRA or other retirement plan, and self-employment tax, which is the equivalent of Social Security taxes for the self-employed.
Suppose I owe only a relatively small amount of tax?
There is no penalty if the tax underpayment for the year is less than $1,000. However, once an underpayment exceeds $1,000, the penalty applies to the full amount of the underpayment.
What if I realize I have miscalculated my tax before the year ends?
An employee may be able to avoid the penalty by getting the employer to increase withholding in an amount needed to cover the shortfall. The IRS will treat the withheld tax as being paid proportionately over the course of the year, even though a greater amount was withheld at year-end. The proportionate treatment could prevent penalties on installments paid earlier in the year.
What else can I do?
If you receive income unevenly over the course of the year, you may benefit from using the annualized income installment method of paying estimated tax. Under this method, your adjusted gross income, self-employment income and alternative minimum taxable income at the end of each quarterly tax payment period are projected forward for the entire year. Estimated tax is paid based on these annualized amounts if the payment is lower than the regular estimated payment. Any decrease in the amount of an estimated tax payment caused by using the annualized installment method must be added back to the next regular estimated tax payment.
Determining estimated taxes can be complicated, but the penalty can be avoided with proper attention. This office stands ready to assist you with this determination. Please contact us if we can help you determine whether you owe estimated taxes.